Time evolution of cytokine profiles associated with mortality in COVID-19 hospitalized patients.

Background: High cytokine levels have been associated with severe COVID-19 disease. Although many cytokine studies have been performed, not many of them include combinatorial analysis of cytokine profiles through time. In this study we investigate the association of certain cytokine profiles and its evolution, and mortality in SARS-CoV2 infection in hospitalized patients. Methods: Serum concentration of 45 cytokines was determined in 28 controls at day of admission and in 108 patients with COVID-19 disease at first, third and sixth day of admission. A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to characterize cytokine profiles through time associated with mortality and survival in hospitalized patients. Results: At day of admission non-survivors present significantly higher levels of IL-1α and VEGFA (PC3) but not through follow up. However, the combination of HGF, MCP-1, IL-18, eotaxine, and SCF (PC2) are significantly higher in non-survivors at all three time-points presenting an increased trend in this group through time. On the other hand, BDNF, IL-12 and IL-15 (PC1) are significantly reduced in non-survivors at all time points with a decreasing trend through time, though a protective factor. The combined mortality prediction accuracy of PC3 at day 1 and PC1 and PC2 at day 6 is 89.00% (p<0.001). Conclusions: Hypercytokinemia is a hallmark of COVID-19 but relevant differences between survivors and non-survivors can be early observed. Combinatorial analysis of serum cytokines and chemokines can contribute to mortality risk assessment and optimize therapeutic strategies. Three clusters of cytokines have been identified as independent markers or risk factors of COVID mortality.

Parental Satisfaction With Autonomous Pediatric Ambulatory Surgery Units.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ambulatory surgery is much favored in children, as they are usually healthy with no major comorbidities. Obvious benefits are minimization of health costs, optimal utilization of resources, decreased exposure to infections, and psychological and emotional advantages of avoiding admission of the patient, especially for the family. Parental satisfaction is a challenge in pediatric surgery processes. The objective of this study was to compare satisfaction in parents whose children underwent surgery without overnight stays with parents whose children were operated on in an autonomous major ambulatory surgery unit (hospital isolated). METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of 200 children who received surgery on an outpatient basis (133 were included in an outpatient unit and 67 in a hospital setting). Different variables were collected, including sex, age, type of surgery, and length of stay in the hospital and location, and a telephone perception survey was conducted (questionnaire of satisfaction of 14 questions with possible answers from 1 to 4 on a Likert scale and a 15th question on global satisfaction, with an answer from 0 to 10). RESULTS: Overall satisfaction during the hospital stay was higher in the group operated on in the autonomous major surgery unit (3.54 ± 0.57 vs 3.28 ± 0.64, P = .004). Whether parents respond as being very satisfied with the hospital stay is influenced by several factors, among which are: being treated at major ambulatory surgery units (odds ratio [OR] = 2.16), good or very good information received prior to surgery (OR = 2.03), and good or very good information received at discharge (OR = 2.48). CONCLUSIONS: Parents of children who received surgery on an outpatient basis were more satisfied if the procedure was performed in an autonomous major ambulatory surgery unit compared with hospitalization, even if it was not overnight. The information received during the care process influenced the parents' satisfaction. These findings suggest that efforts should be devoted to the creation of autonomous units for ambulatory surgery and to the improvement of perioperative information.

Impact of empirical treatment with antifungal agents on survival of patients with candidemia / Impacto del tratamiento antifúngico empírico en la supervivencia de pacientes con candidemia

Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of echinocandins and fluconazole) on mortality 7 and 30 days after candidemia onset and overall in-hospital mortality), in patients with candidemia at a Spanish tertiary hospital. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted that enrolled all non-neutropenic adult patients diagnosed with candidemia at Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid between 2007 and 2016. A total of 179 patients were evaluated, they were divided into two sub-groups: surviving patients (n = 92) and non-surviving patients (n = 87). Results: The 7-day mortality was 25,1% (45), 30-day mortality was 46,9% (84), and overall in-hospital mortality was 48,6% (87). 40.8% of patients received no antifungal treatment (43.8% of surviving patients and 37.8% of non-surviving patients; p=0.15). A total of 106 (59.2%) patients were treated, of which 90 patients (50.3%) received empiric treatment. 19.6% and 47.8% of surviving patients were treated with echinocandins and fluconazole, respectively. By contrast, of non-surviving patients, 31.0% were treated with echinocandins and 47.1% received fluconazole. Survival for the first 7 days was significantly higher in treated with antifungal agents (log-rank = 0.029), however, there were not significant differences in 30-day survival. Factors linked to a significant increase in overall in-hospital mortality were age (OR 1.040), septic shock (OR 2.694) and need for mechanical ventilation > 48 h (OR 2.812). Conclusion: Patients who received antifungal treatment, regardless of whether they received fluconazole or echinocandins, had a significantly lower mortality rate after 7 days than untreated patients, although no significant differences in 30-day mortality were seen

Introducción: El objetivo del estudio es evaluar el impacto del tratamiento antifúngico en la mortalidad hospitalaria a los 7 y 30 días en pacientes con candidemia en un hospital terciario español. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo que incluyó los pacientes adultos no neutropénicos diagnosticados de candidemia en el Hospital Clínico Universitario entre 2007 y 2016. Se evaluaron 179 pacientes, se dividieron en grupo de supervivientes (n=92) y no supervivientes (n=87). Resultados: La mortalidad a 7 días fue 25,1% (45), a los 30 días 46,9% (84) y la hospitalaria 48,6% (87). El 40,8% no recibieron antifúngico (43,8% de supervivientes y 37,8% de no supervivientes; p=0,15). El 50,3% (90) recibieron tratamiento empírico. De los supervivientes el 19,6% y 47,8% se trataron con equinocandinas y fluconazol, respectivamente. De los no supervivientes el 31% recibió equinocandinas y el 47,1% fluconazol. La supervivencia a los 7 días fue significativamente mayor en los tratados (log-rank = 0.029), no hubo diferencias a los 30 días. Los factores asociados a mortalidad hospitalaria fueron edad (OR: 1.040), shock séptico (OR: 2.694) y ventilación mecánica> 48 h (OR: 2.812). Conclusión: Los pacientes tratados con antifúngicos (ya sean equinocandinas o fluconazol) tienen una tasa de mortalidad inferior a los 7 días que los no tratados, sin embargo no hallamos diferencias a los 30 días

Impact of an ultraviolet air sterilizer on cardiac surgery patients, a randomized clinical trial / Impacto de un esterilizador ultravioleta en pacientes de cirugía cardíaca: ensayo clínico aleatorizado

Background: Numerous studies have evaluated the use of ultraviolet-C devices for terminal disinfection in hospitals, however, to date there is little information about the device's final impact on patients. We investigated the effect of an ultraviolet air sterilizer (UVAS) on the clinical outcomes of cardiac surgery patients. Materials and methods: This random, prospective and non-interventional study included 1097 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery: 522 stayed in an ICU room with UVAS (Medixair®) and 575 patients ICU room without UVAS and were used as a control. The primary outcome measure was to evaluate the effect of a UVAS on the overall prevalence of nosocomial infections in postoperative cardiac patients in ICUs. Results: No significant differences in ventilator-associated pneumonia (4.6% vs. 5.0%, p=0.77) and total infection (14.0% vs. 15.5%, p=0.45) rates were detected in patients with and without the UVAS. The length of stay in the intensive care unit and at the hospital was similar in both groups, UVAS (4.6 (8.2) days and 18.3 (5.5) days) and without UVAS (4.6 (7.3) days and 19.2 (18.6) days). The 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was 5.3%, no significant differences between groups were observed (p=0.053). Conclusion: Novel ultraviolet-C technology has not been shown to significantly reduce nosocomial infections or mortality rates in cardiac surgery patients

Introducción: Numerosos estudios han evaluado el uso de dispositivos ultravioleta C para la desinfección terminal en hospitales; sin embargo, hasta la fecha existen pocos datos sobre el impacto en los pacientes. Hemos evaluado el efecto de un esterilizador de aire ultravioleta (UVAS) sobre las variables clínicas de los pacientes operados de cirugía cardíaca. Materiales y métodos: Este estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado no intervencional incluyó 1.097 pacientes adultos intervenidos de cirugía cardíaca electiva: 522 ingresaron en una habitación de UCI con UVAS (Medixair®) y 575 pacientes en habitación de UCI sin UVAS se utilizaron como control. La variable principal medida fue el efecto del UVAS sobre la prevalencia global de infecciones en el postoperatorio de cirugía cardíaca en UCI. Resultados: No hubo diferencias significativas en la neumonía asociada a ventilación mecánica (4,6% vs. 5,0%, p=0,77) e índices totales de infección (14,0% vs. 15,5%, p=0,45) detectados en pacientes con y sin UVAS. La duración del ingreso en UCI y en el hospital fue similar en ambos grupos, UVAS (4,6 [8,2] días y 18,3 [5,5] días) y sin UVAS (4,6 [7,3] días y 19,2 [18,6] días). La mortalidad a 30 días hospitalaria fue del 5,3%, sin diferencias significativas entre los grupos (p=0,053). Conclusión: La nueva tecnología ultravioleta C no ha demostrado disminuir las infecciones nosocomiales ni la mortalidad en pacientes de cirugía cardíaca

Impact of an ultraviolet air sterilizer on cardiac surgery patients, a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have evaluated the use of ultraviolet-C devices for terminal disinfection in hospitals, however, to date there is little information about the device's final impact on patients. We investigated the effect of an ultraviolet air sterilizer (UVAS) on the clinical outcomes of cardiac surgery patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This random, prospective and non-interventional study included 1097 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery: 522 stayed in an ICU room with UVAS (Medixair®) and 575 patients ICU room without UVAS and were used as a control. The primary outcome measure was to evaluate the effect of a UVAS on the overall prevalence of nosocomial infections in postoperative cardiac patients in ICUs. RESULTS: No significant differences in ventilator-associated pneumonia (4.6% vs. 5.0%, p=0.77) and total infection (14.0% vs. 15.5%, p=0.45) rates were detected in patients with and without the UVAS. The length of stay in the intensive care unit and at the hospital was similar in both groups, UVAS (4.6 (8.2) days and 18.3 (5.5) days) and without UVAS (4.6 (7.3) days and 19.2 (18.6) days). The 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was 5.3%, no significant differences between groups were observed (p=0.053). CONCLUSION: Novel ultraviolet-C technology has not been shown to significantly reduce nosocomial infections or mortality rates in cardiac surgery patients.

Relationship between European mitochondrial haplogroups and chronic renal allograft rejection in patients with kidney transplant.

Mitochondrial DNA variants may contribute to differences in mitochondrial function, leading to an altered immune system. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between mtDNA haplogroups and the development of chronic allograft dysfunction in patients with kidney transplant. A retrospective observational study was carried out on 261 patients who received kidney transplant (114 had stable transplant and 147 patients developed chronic allograft dysfunction). DNA samples were genotyped for 14 mtDNA polymorphisms by using Sequenom's MassARRAY platform (San Diego, CA, USA). Only European white patients within the N macro-cluster were included. Patients with haplogroups V (odds ratio (OR)=0.32; p=0.037) and J (OR=0.36; p=0.038) showed lower odds for developing CRAD than patients with haplogroup H. After adjusting for the most significant variables, haplogroups V and J tended to statistical significance (p=0.091 and p=0.067 respectively). This is a preliminary study in which mtDNA haplogroups seem to be implicated in susceptibility or protection for developing chronic allograft dysfunction.